Northern Ireland Opposes UK Unified Gambling Tax Plan
UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves is facing intensifying political resistance to the government’s plan to merge all remote gambling levies under a single tax rate, after the Northern Ireland Assembly’s All-Party Group (APG) on Reducing Gambling Harm issued an open appeal opposing the proposal.
Assembly Group Rejects One-Rate Gambling Tax
The APG’s letter, addressed directly to Reeves, urges the Treasury to withdraw plans for a unified Remote Betting and Gaming Duty (RBGD) and instead apply a higher tax rate to online casino and slots products. Lawmakers argue that aligning taxes between remote betting and gaming ignores the disproportionate harm associated with online gambling.
Current Treasury proposals would consolidate all remote gambling duties at 21%, mirroring the existing Remote Gaming Duty. Proponents claim the move would simplify compliance and create parity across operators. However, critics contend that such uniformity undermines public health objectives and fails to acknowledge the elevated risks of online play.
Philip McGuigan MLA, who chairs the APG, said the reform “runs contrary” to Labour’s commitment to reducing gambling-related harm:
“The evidence is overwhelming online slots and casino games are far more damaging than sports betting. Equalizing their tax rate would reward harmful products rather than discourage them.”
McGuigan added that gambling addiction costs the UK economy more than £1 billion each year, warning that parity in tax treatment would ignore the social toll “borne by individuals, families and entire communities.”
Policy Momentum Gathers Beyond Northern Ireland
The intervention aligns with analysis from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), which has called for a 50% tax rate on online gaming. The think tank estimates such an increase could raise an extra £1.88 billion annually, suggesting the revenue could strengthen funding for treatment programs and prevention campaigns.
Growing cross-party consensus in Westminster and devolved assemblies now reflects a broader belief that the online gambling industry remains undertaxed compared with its social impact.
Industry Pushback Meets Political Skepticism
Major operators, including Evoke and Betfred, have warned that higher duties could threaten retail operations and result in widespread job losses. They argue that an aggressive tax increase could drive players toward unregulated markets or prompt operators to move offshore.
However, in its latest report published on 7 November, the House of Commons Treasury Committee dismissed such warnings as “industry fear tactics.” The committee, which includes MPs from all major parties, criticized the Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) for downplaying evidence of gambling harm and failing to acknowledge the public cost.
In its concluding recommendations, the committee said:
“Different gambling products create different levels of risk and harm. Treasury policy should reflect that distinction. Remote gaming and machine gaming duties must be set higher than general gaming duty to protect consumers and communities.”
Reeves Faces Balancing Act Ahead of Budget
With the 26 November budget fast approaching, Reeves faces a difficult balancing act between fiscal recovery and rising political demands for stronger consumer protection. The Chancellor has already stated that gambling companies must “pay their fair share,” a stance that industry analysts interpret as a signal of imminent tax hikes on remote gaming.
Should the Treasury heed these calls, the shift could mark one of the most significant gambling tax reforms in the UK in more than a decade reshaping how online operators contribute to the economy while reinforcing the government’s public health agenda.
